otomatalabs/furnace
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

C64: relative cutoff and duty macros are fine

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
tildearrow 2023-10-29 04:36:25 -05:00
parent f05d1693f8
commit e2278d3688
5 changed files with 27 additions and 12 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

7
src/gui/sysConf.cpp
View file

@ -587,6 +587,7 @@ bool FurnaceGUI::drawSysConf(int chan, int sysPos, DivSystem type, DivConfig& fl
int clockSel=flags.getInt("clockSel",0);
bool keyPriority=flags.getBool("keyPriority",true);
bool no1EUpdate=flags.getBool("no1EUpdate",false);
bool multiplyRel=flags.getBool("multiplyRel",false);
int testAttack=flags.getInt("testAttack",0);
int testDecay=flags.getInt("testDecay",0);
int testSustain=flags.getInt("testSustain",0);
@ -662,11 +663,17 @@ bool FurnaceGUI::drawSysConf(int chan, int sysPos, DivSystem type, DivConfig& fl
altered=true;
}
if (ImGui::Checkbox("Relative duty and cutoff macros are coarse (compatibility)",&multiplyRel)) {
altered=true;
}
if (altered) {
e->lockSave([&]() {
flags.set("clockSel",clockSel);
flags.set("keyPriority",keyPriority);
flags.set("no1EUpdate",no1EUpdate);
flags.set("multiplyRel",multiplyRel);
flags.set("testAttack",testAttack);
flags.set("testDecay",testDecay);
flags.set("testSustain",testSustain);